Friday, December 12, 2008

Self Evaluation

The purpose of my speech was to persuade my audience as to why they should support gay marriage. Not for themselves, not for their church, but for equality. I think I did a good job bringing awareness of this issue to my audience. If they are religious, homophobic, or unaware of the problem with gay rights, I certainly brought it to their attention by using examples that concerned them. I’m pretty sure the whole class raised their hand when I asked if they knew someone who is gay. In that sense, they are supporting their friends and family. When reading my feedback, only one person gave me a low rate of how persuasive I was. It must have been more of a personal issue, but my reasons of history and equality did not get through to them for some reason. I expected mixed responses though because my topic was very touchy.
As far as confidence goes, I certainly felt more confident this time than I did with my demo speech. After doing the three speeches, I learned how to prepare better, manage my time better, and paid more attention to what was on the grading sheet, like the structure of my speech. I knew who my audience was, and it was a little easier since a lot of people dropped the course since the first meet. The only thing I think could have been stronger was my support. I went crazy researching this topic because there is a ton of information of gay marriage, and millions of opinions for and against it. Monroe’s Motivated Sequence definitely helped with my organization, so out of everything, I could have improved my delivery. I’m still not comfortable enough presenting my speech without note cards or with only a few notes on the cards, but I could have practiced a lot more. I should have tried practicing in front of a group of people, that may have helped. Another thing I could have done better is use a better variety of sources. I didn’t use any textbooks this time, which could have been helpful. I did, however, cite the sources I did use, which was mostly internet and interviews. I counted four sources throughout my entire speech.
In my last speech, I swayed back and forth a lot and got a few comments back about it, so this time, I tried to stay still. It was my nerves that was causing my to move back and forth I think. I didn’t notice anything distracting this time in my speech, except that I could have sounded a little more enthusiastic. I tend to sound very monotone when I speak in public. I used my note cards less this time than the last, which I did unconsciously because I didn’t realize that I actually knew my topic, so there was no need to constantly glance down. My eye contact was much better than my last speech, and I would rate it an 8. I didn’t memorize my speech on purpose, and only used my cards to remind me of what’s next.
Based on my overall performance, I would give myself an A-. I took past comments and suggestions into consideration and focused on not making the same mistakes. I even structured my speech a little better than I did before. I know my speech was not perfect because I went over my time limit for the third time and could have practiced more until it was almost perfect. But overall, I think I did a pretty good job and deserved at least an A-. I didn’t get any negative comments this time, so I’m not sure where I went wrong except for the time limit. This speech was definitely an improvement from the previous two, as I performed the best this time.

No comments: